Laws » What is an Apple Planned Obsolescence Lawsuit?

What is an Apple Planned Obsolescence Lawsuit?

What is an Apple planned obsolescence lawsuit? It’s an extremely common lawsuit, but what exactly is planned obsolescence? Read on to find out. This article covers some of the main aspects of this lawsuit, including Lithium-ion batteries, software updates, and shutdowns. We’ll also cover damages. Hopefully, this article will give you some useful information for filing your own Apple lawsuit.

Lithium-ion batteries

In France, a group called Halte an obsolescence Program has filed a planned obsolescence lawsuit against Apple. They claim that Apple has violated the French law by slowing down iPhones without warning or compensating for poor battery performance. A fine of up to five percent of the company’s annual sales could be assessed against them. The lawsuit alleges that Apple’s lithium-ion batteries were designed to last for only a few years.

Apple is currently facing 59 putative class actions in 16 district courts, including the Northern District of California. The company has denied the allegations and cut replacement costs for users. It has also developed a patch to prevent battery throttling on iOS devices. The company has also investigated the theory that older iPhones experience performance reductions as battery life decreases. The lawsuit has been consolidated because Apple’s lack of communication on the issue has hampered the company’s response to the problem.

Software update

Apple is facing a class-action lawsuit over planned obsolescence over a software update. The lawsuit targets Apple iPhone models including the iPhone 11, iPhone 12 Pro, and iPhone 12 Max. The plaintiff owns one of the affected models. She purchased the phone in 2017 and later updated its mobile operating system. Apple says the update fixed a glitch related to aging batteries. However, she has since noticed that the phone runs slower and has poorer battery life.

The Altroconsumo class action lawsuit is the third similar case against Apple in Europe. Two other similar lawsuits were filed in Spain and Belgium under the umbrella of Euro consumers. The group is also planning to file the fourth lawsuit in Portugal. However, Apple has denied the allegations. A preliminary court hearing against Apple is scheduled for July 26, 2021, and the company is expected to pay the plaintiff at least 60 euros per affected consumer.


An Arizona judge recently ruled that Apple’s planned obsolescence lawsuit may cause device shutdowns, but the company has denied the allegations. The plaintiffs say that Apple intentionally slows down iPhones to control their energy consumption. While the company initially said that the updated software was just for bug fixes, the complaint states that the update contained a software algorithm that decreased system performance and prevented spontaneous shutdowns. It was a clear case of deliberate product sluggishness. Apple made its products worse so they wouldn’t be caught, forcing customers to buy updates that would make their products worse.

The French prosecutor’s office opened a preliminary investigation against Apple on January 5. The department is part of the Directorate General of Competition, Repression of Frauds, and Consumer Protection. The investigation alleged that Apple is violating antitrust laws by making older iPhone models run slower than newer versions. The company claims that the algorithm limiting processor stress on older iPhones helped prevent unexpected shutdowns.


A class-action lawsuit against Apple is surfacing. A consumer rights group in Belgium is challenging planned obsolescence on iPhone models. And a Spanish consumer rights group is challenging the practice in Spain as well. The class action is being led by Euro consumers, a European consumer protection organization. The group is seeking damages for Spanish consumers who suffered performance throttling due to an automatic update in 2015. The lawsuit was filed after Apple apologized for the forced update and offered to replace the battery at a reduced price.

The Altroconsumo lawsuit is the third similar lawsuit against Apple in Europe. The first two were filed in Spain and the third in Portugal, and the group hopes to file the fourth lawsuit in Portugal in the coming weeks. Apple has denied the accusations and says the lawsuits are “a myth.”


The latest news on the Apple planned obsolescence lawsuit is no longer limited to the headlines in the Washington Post. Apple’s latest legal battle involves freezing wells, extra tinned goods, and printers. The lawsuit also targets manufacturing processes and the Ministry of Obsolescence. Here’s what you need to know. The key to winning the case is the Ministry of Obsolescence’s documentation.

The latest case involving Apple’s use of planned obsolescence is a multistate class-action lawsuit called Bilic et al. v. Apple, Inc. (2018). The lawsuit alleges that Apple marketed and sold defective batteries while simultaneously sending software updates that reduced the capacity of the devices. This allegedly cost plaintiffs significant out-of-pocket expenses. The lawsuit was eventually settled for over $2 billion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top